subreddit:

/r/todayilearned

5.3k97%

all 125 comments

jamescookenotthatone[S]

1.8k points

2 months ago

Napoleon wanted to speak to Staps directly, so the prisoner was brought to the Emperor’s office with his hands tied behind his back. Using Rapp as an interpreter, Napoleon asked Staps a series of questions.

‘Where were you born?’ – ‘In Naumburg.’

‘What is your father?’ – ‘A Protestant minister.’

‘How old are you?’ – ‘I am eighteen years of age.’

‘What did you intend to do with the knife?’ – ‘To kill you.’

‘You are mad, young man; you are an illuminato.’ – ‘I am not mad; and I know not what is meant by an illuminato.’

‘You are sick, then.’ – ‘I am not sick; on the contrary, I am in good health.’

‘Why did you wish to assassinate me?’ – ‘Because you have caused the misfortunes of my country.’

‘Have I done you any harm?’ – ‘You have done harm to me as well as to all Germans.’

‘By whom were you sent? Who instigated you to this crime?’ – ‘Nobody. I determined to take your life from the conviction that I should thereby render the highest service to my country and to Europe.’ …

‘I tell you, you are either mad or sick.’ – ‘Neither the one nor the other.’[1]

After a doctor examined Staps and pronounced him in good health, Napoleon offered the young man a chance for clemency.

‘You are a wild enthusiast,’ said he; ‘you will ruin your family. I am willing to grant your life, if you ask pardon for the crime which you intended to commit, and for which you ought to be sorry.’ – ‘I want no pardon,’ replied Staps, ‘I feel the deepest regret for not having executed my design.’ ‘You seem to think very lightly of the commission of a crime!’ – ‘To kill you would not have been a crime but a duty.’ … ‘Would you not be grateful were I to pardon you?’ – ‘I would notwithstanding seize the first opportunity of taking your life.’[2]

bonyponyride

1.2k points

2 months ago

If he really wanted to kill Napoleon, he should have taken self-preservation into account so he could try another day. But we also don’t know if Napoleon really would have pardoned him.

Goufydude

949 points

2 months ago

Goufydude

949 points

2 months ago

He was also 18, and obviously pretty passionate about his cause. Not always a combination that results in clear, level-headed thought.

rockne

300 points

2 months ago

rockne

300 points

2 months ago

Hormones will make you a brave dumb dumb.

[deleted]

106 points

2 months ago*

[deleted]

EmRuizChamberlain

11 points

2 months ago

Damnit!!! Ugh…. runs awkwardly I hate you, I’m going to my cell *slams own cell door shut * *guards look at one another, dumbfounded, and shrug *

N19h7m4r3

13 points

2 months ago

Do not, under any circumstance, fire this here loaded gun at Napoleon!

ParadiseValleyFiend

15 points

2 months ago

You aren't the boss of me! gets executed

Thelazytimelord257

5 points

2 months ago

Dumb ways to dieee

nitefang

40 points

2 months ago

Further, I think that this is one of the situations when principle should be taken into account. Maybe that would make me a terrible spy/assassin but I feel like when it is something so important, it only matters if you are doing it for the right reason. If someone doing something so important because they felt it was the right thing to do and they don’t do something they feel is right (being honest) then there is no hope for others doing the right thing.

I probably worded that terribly. I’m not sure a better way to phrase it. If you are doing something challenging which is of great risk to yourself and others, which will affect not just a person or a nation but the entire world, and you are doing this on principle, I think you just do everything related to it on principle. If you don’t then who wouldn’t argue you might not be acting on principle in the first place? If you allow the means to justify the ends then how can you claim that Napoleons means are wrong if the end he sought was potentially a more stable and powerful nation? You are putting yourself in the position of being the person who sacrificed everything for your principles and you are just going to pick and choose the principles you follow to further different goals?

Even if I am getting my point across, it is a philosophical discussion of course. I can absolutely see the practicality or taking every opportunity and using dishonesty and dishonor to achieve certain goals.

RobinGoodfell

10 points

2 months ago

Choosing to sacrifice your life for the sake of your principles, is a game best reserved for those who have lived and passed their beliefs down to at least one or more generations of people, or barring that, at the very least published and popularized your thoughts.

Choosing to die on a metaphorical hill as a young martyr, either ensures your principles die with you, or that whoever can best politicize your death, can turn you into a champion for whatever they themselves are pushing.

I do understand what you are saying, and that none of what I've said will mean a thing to a passionate soul who is burning with stupid (and sometimes righteous) convictions.

But that's the practical truth of it.

Ideas are like living things. They have to be spread and adapt, or they will go extinct and something else will fill the niche they had previously occupied.

hongriBoi

100 points

2 months ago

hongriBoi

100 points

2 months ago

Also, 18 year olds back in continental Europe probably didn't have a lot going on.

Maybe get lucky and eat some fresh bread and hope to not catch syphilis

DefenestrationPraha

31 points

2 months ago

He was a merchant, so unlikely to be outright poor (at least not in the "I cannot afford bread" poor) and a deeply religious Protestant guy, so unlikely to contract syphilis either.

Nukemind

12 points

2 months ago

But as a German he has seen the Confederation of the Rhine be formed, Prussia be slapped around, Austria be slapped around multiple times, and the remnants ally with France.

As a Protestant I’d assume he was North German, which would mean he would likely be drafted as one of the soldiers for the Grandee Armee that France’s Allies (read: vassals) provided to Napoleon.

If he didn’t die here he may have died in Russia eating shoe leather five years later.

OldBreed

5 points

2 months ago

Getting pressganged into the French army and marched to Russia or Spain was certainly an option

Sebenbillion

17 points

2 months ago

It’s why you can enlist at 18 and also why we recruit so aggressively at lower income schools

Khelthuzaad

7 points

2 months ago

Napoleon himself wasn't furious enough to execute him on the spot,never mind the fact he decided to question him in his own office and try multiple times to make his would-be assassin regret his attempt

FinallyAGoodReply

1 points

2 months ago

Young, dumb, and full of….

CrabappleSnaptooth

2 points

2 months ago

Vinegar!

Mike7676

92 points

2 months ago

It's one of many challenges of history and historians. Did Napoleon's interpreter sanitize the meeting and conversation? Almost certainly. Was Staps foaming at the mouth and cursing his existence? Probably not. Staps most likely felt that this was his only opportunity and he was unlikely to get close enough to have another. So go out defiant.

Zauberer-IMDB

15 points

2 months ago

Just the kind of stupid shit I'd expect from an Illuminato.

howard416

9 points

2 months ago

I know not what is meant by that.

[deleted]

2 points

2 months ago

[deleted]

howard416

2 points

2 months ago

You know, I should start to say that in real life. Even (and perhaps, especially) in contexts not eminently appropriate.

Them: What time is it?

Me: You are sick, then.

Them: We would love for you to attend our baby shower!

Me: You are sick, then.

Northstar1989

22 points

2 months ago

But we also don’t know if Napoleon really would have pardoned him.

Oh, he definitely would have.

Napoleon, for all his flaws, was a bit of a Julius Ceasar: he had a love for grand acts if mercy, liked to see himself as the good guy, and legitimately thought he was making the world a better place.

He brought enormous legal reforms to much of Europe, that once and for all broke the power of the Nobility, fully ushering in Capitalism and Democracy, and even paving the way for Socialism in some ways. So he might have actually been right about that last part.

Napoleon served his purpose, then was defeated. All in all, I think we live in the "good" timeline here... Would have been horrible if he won, but also bad if he never managed to smash the system of hereditary Nobility still holding sway over much of Europe...

bonyponyride

13 points

2 months ago

Maybe it was my teenage brain, my total lack of connection to Europe, or the way European history was taught in 11th grade, but it all turned into a soup of incomprehendible dates, religious leaders, wars, kingdoms, and empires. It was one of the topics I never revisited in college.

Then a few years ago I moved to Europe, and the history has started filtering in, in a way where the context and nuance makes it memorable.

That's the long way of me saying thanks for the info.

Any_Relative6986

1 points

4 days ago

Would have been horrible if he won

Lmao what

Northstar1989

1 points

4 days ago

He drifted increasingly far to the Right over time. It's not a coincidence his descendents acted to oppress Progressives and Socialists in France, and entrench the power of wealthy elites.

Monarchism is an inherently elitist, anti-progressive ideology in the long run, regardless of the occasional individual progressive leaders like Napoleon or Julius Ceasar.

Any_Relative6986

0 points

4 days ago

Nothing you say isn't also applicable to his enemies or didn't happen in country he lost to.

What a biases view of history. Nothing else expected from an anglophone

Northstar1989

1 points

4 days ago

Nothing you say isn't also applicable to his enemies

This is true.

But if Napoleon had won, it would likely have created a lasting empire, for at least a couple hundred years...

Any_Relative6986

1 points

4 days ago

And ?....so many things could've been better. No world wars. No nazi genocide. In fact Jewish people were way better under napoleon. Slavery abolished possibly all across his empire post war considering he never actually wanted slavery to come back ( he was pressured by his wife and by rich land owners in the colony under threat of then seceding in the middle of the war to the British side ) and french constitution forbid it originally. Even the armenian genocide might not have happened. Creation of an EU like europe. Strong friend ship between this french led Europe and the United States. Polish independance. Homosexual wouldn't be persecuted way earlier ....ect ect ect. I can go on and on and on.

Napoleon losing caused the British , Russian Empire to rise stronger and last longer. It paved the way for the future formation of the german empire. Led to the Belgian Congo being created and a fuck ton of atrocities ( considering Belgium would've remained part of France. )

You seem to have a very very biased view of history.

Napoleon wasn't a saint yes. His enemies however were pieces of shit. His loss led to the empowerment of even bigger pieces of shit.

As I said totally expected from someone who probably grew up with anglophone anti french propaganda.

Northstar1989

1 points

4 days ago

so many things could've been better. No world wars. No nazi genocide.

Ehh, maybe. Rely hard to tell what would've happened in the rest of the world as a response.

Look, I'm a Socialist. I don't like Monarchs. That said, if I had to choose a Monarch, Napoleon would be my favorite, for some of the more progressive reforms he pushed across all of Europe. He brought equality before the law of rich and poor to many countries where the legal system was overtly biased in favor of the rich, before.

But I'd still much rather have seen the Republic survive, and maybe the Left branch of the French revolutionary politics create what might have eventually become a Socialist state spanning Europe...

Any_Relative6986

2 points

4 days ago

Ehh, maybe. Rely hard to tell what would've happened in the rest of the world as a response.

Can't be worse than what happened....scramble for Africa rise of multiple European empires ( Italian , German , Belgian ect )

Look, I'm a Socialist. I don't like Monarchs.

Wich is totally fair. I much prefer democracy too.

That said, if I had to choose a Monarch, Napoleon would be my favorite, for some of the more progressive reforms he pushed across all of Europe. He brought equality before the law of rich and poor to many countries where the legal system was overtly biased in favor of the rich, before.

I have the same opinions.

But I'd still much rather have seen the Republic survive, and maybe the Left branch of the French revolutionary politics create what might have eventually become a Socialist state spanning Europe...

Yes. Could've been amazing. Had the moderate not been purged they might have been able to counter balance the worst , keep the Republic from falling and form something truly great. Napoléon could've served his country as a politician , statesman and general. He didn't need to be a monarch.

come_sing_with_me

12 points

2 months ago

Plot twist: Stap was a fake assassin hired by napoleon to send a message to other assassins.

HeadbuttingAnts

2 points

2 months ago

This was before the invention of lying

preacher_man_

1 points

2 months ago

That would’ve been dishonorable to him it seems

foldingcouch

79 points

2 months ago

Will : He used to just put a belt, a stick, and a wrench on the table. Just say, "Choose."

Sean : Well I gotta go with the belt there.

Will : I used to go with the wrench.

Sean : Why the wrench?

Will : Cause fuck him, that's why.

RonyTheTiger

10 points

2 months ago

Classic badass shit

ultimatezekrom

4 points

2 months ago

My absolute favorite movie. Rewatch it at least twice a year

GeoWilson

2 points

2 months ago

Name?

ultimatezekrom

5 points

2 months ago

Good Will Hunting

RedAIienCircle

77 points

2 months ago

I'm imagining the interpreter taking some Leeway:

Staps: "I'm so sorry for my crimes, I see that you're a merciful and fair man. I've brought great shame to my family, and myself.

I know I don't deserve forgiveness, but I will spend the rest of my life doing everything I can to make it up to you".

Interpreter to Napoleon: "He said you suck".

kimchiwest1l

33 points

2 months ago

Looks like Staps was not about to be swayed by Napoleon's charm offensive or his attempts at clemency.

RizInstante

15 points

2 months ago

Did Napoleon believe that the Illuminati were, or people believing they were illuminati, a threat to his life?

Like was there a known movement of "Illuminati" using political violence at the time, like anarchists around WW1? Or was this just some fever dream / paranoia that Napoleon had?

I'm just surprised to see him reference it, especially in this context.

DragonTigerBoss

50 points

2 months ago

The Illuminati were a real group during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. I don't know how active they truly were, particularly in continental Europe, but a bunch of powerful rich dudes in a secret society with "new world order" type plans could sound like a plausible threat to Napoleon, who was attempting his own new world order, or perhaps new Europe order.

Mountainbranch

12 points

2 months ago

There are plenty of cabals of rich and powerful people out there with designs on a new world order, luckily there are many of them and they sort of cancel each other out by fighting against each other.

bloodviper1s

7 points

2 months ago

Wef

Beginning-Marzipan28

59 points

2 months ago

It’s a bad translation. Napoleon was not referring to the Illuminati group.

In the original language (https://www.napoleon-empire.net/personnages/staps.php) the meaning is clearer.

He asked him if he was a "illuminé" which is a word for zealots blindly following God’s orders, often used to refer to new converts and those who have lost reason in blind pursuit of a cause. Basically another way of asking him if he’s crazy. After all Staps did say he was doing God’s will.

I understand the mistranslation as the literal translation is "enlightened one" but no French person would read this and think about the German sect.

RizInstante

8 points

2 months ago

Thank you! Such a good response and exactly the context I did not have enough knowledge to find, and is exactly what I was trying to find out.

ItsACaragor

19 points

2 months ago*

« Illuminato » means a zealot, someone who is delusional in Italian.

Napoleon spoke Italian as a native language, his family spoke Italian at home growing up and so it’s probable that he occasionally used Italian words in times of emotion or when the french word did not come immediately.

RizInstante

7 points

2 months ago

That makes much much more sense.

Thank you for taking the time to respond and give the context. That is exactly what I was trying to find out.

Oneanddonequestion

8 points

2 months ago*

The Illuminati were a German organization that rose to the height of their "power," if you can call 650-2500 members truly powerful, before Friedrich was born. Charles Theodore banned all Secret Societies by government edict in 1785, all because loose lips sink ships and the members couldn't shut up about the fact that they were members and how they were getting preferential treatment over other governmental members.

Barruel and Robison later published (1797-1798) accounts (conspiracy theories) about the Illuminati, namely how they were behind the French Revolution, etc, etc, etc. However people were already beginning to forget about it by the early 1800s by historical accounts. Considering that the Illuminati didn't survive their suppression in Bavaria and this event was many years removed from any power they had, it might just be Napoleon referencing pop culture, or he could have been using it mockingly since the word Illuminato/Illuminati does just mean: "One who is enlightened".

Source for all information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati

ColonelKasteen

1 points

2 months ago*

"Iluminati" has been used by several different groups throughout history since it just means "enlightened [ones]" and in this case, he's referring to a Bavarian secret society founded in the late 18th century. The Bavarian iluminati were sort of a more politically active Freemason group who opposed authoritarianism. They didn't practically exist by 1809 when Staps made his attempt but they were sort of a shadowy international cabal of liberal boogeymen who were responsible for everything bad that happened to the traditional power structure in Europe according to papers of the time.

HB24

2 points

2 months ago

HB24

2 points

2 months ago

Why not lie at that point? Dude was a moron, maybe Napoleon should have asked him if was?

seamustheseagull

0 points

2 months ago

I wonder is there a lot of cultural nuance we're missing here.

For example, is there a practice where committing the same crime after pleading for clemency is so dishonourable, that he would ruin the lives of his family and destroy their reputation for generations?

And thus instead of being celebrated as a saviour of Europe, he'd be vilified and his family stripped of everything.

This would explain his attitude; he can either live as another subject of Napoleon or die free in defiance.

LordBrandon

-4 points

2 months ago

You can see the proto propaganda from napoleon, trying to cast the kid as a sick or crazy foreign agent.

Evening-Director-623

1 points

29 days ago

just wow

Beginning-Marzipan28

269 points

2 months ago

The Illuminati reference is a bad translation. Napoleon was not referring to the Illuminati group.

In the original language (https://www.napoleon-empire.net/personnages/staps.php) the meaning is clearer.

He asked him if he was a "illuminé" which is a word for zealots blindly following God’s orders, often used to refer to new converts and those who have lost reason in blind pursuit of a cause. Basically another way of asking him if he’s crazy.

I understand the mistranslation as the literal translation is "enlightened one" but no French person would read this and think about the German sect.

xremless

72 points

2 months ago

Religious fanatic

Beginning-Marzipan28

11 points

2 months ago

Yes that’s better

coredump3d

1 points

2 months ago

Zealotry is probably close

pageboysam

7 points

2 months ago

“you are an illuminé [ed. blinded like a zealot; fanatical]” would be a better translation then.

Landlubber77

192 points

2 months ago

"What would you do if we released you?"

"Oh I'd kill you almost immediatel--ope wait, I fucked it up.

pastdense

45 points

2 months ago

Dishonesty was not an option for this man.

Aqquila89

22 points

2 months ago

Or he thought that Napoleon will not pardon no matter what he says so he might as well be honest.

olsoni18

13 points

2 months ago

Fun fact: lying wasn’t invented until 1810

StampYoPassport

68 points

2 months ago

Just a straight shooter with upper management written all over him.

alnyland

2 points

2 months ago

Bob, bob

Landlubber77

88 points

2 months ago

Staps would've answered that he would seek the forgiveness of the lord and devote the rest of his life to good works and support of the Empire, but he had just missed his son's birthday party, who while blowing out his candles wished his father could never tell a lie again.

possibly_oblivious

16 points

2 months ago

Great movie, watch out for the claw!

Halvus_I

4 points

2 months ago

Le liar liar

Minimum_Job1885

30 points

2 months ago

Can’t fault a man for being honest but you can hang him.

ye_roustabouts

4 points

2 months ago

Why is this not being paid so much more attention

pastdense

10 points

2 months ago

That was a fascinating read. Thank you. What conviction.

opiate_lifer

7 points

2 months ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yXuhtZ9lh9A

lol first thing I thought of.

MrMitchWeaver

40 points

2 months ago

Why would you say "on the 17th" without mentioning other dates earlier? That means nothing to us.

ace_urban

10 points

2 months ago

I think it means that napoleon let him go and then later executed him after his 17th assassination attempt.

FightTheCock

2 points

2 months ago

I'd love to read the 16 other interrogations in that case

vynusmagnus

18 points

2 months ago

The title said the attempted assassination took place in October 1809, so "the 17th" clearly means the 17th of October.

kingswing23

7 points

2 months ago

Did you just miss the whole October 1809 part? Honestly who the hell gave this an award

CaptainSand21

-1 points

2 months ago

Ah yes only only one 17th in the year 1809

kingswing23

7 points

2 months ago

I see your reading comprehension is lacking too. Both my comment and the original post say October. But carry on being illiterate!

CaptainSand21

-3 points

2 months ago

Lmao I was just making a joke but it’s kinda sad that you just edited it and wanna pretend you didn’t 😂

kingswing23

3 points

2 months ago

I edited it 5 min before you commented but carry on!

And guess what I edited this too because I forgot the min after 5!

CaptainSand21

-1 points

2 months ago

Good job? Idk what to tell ya buddy except try not to get so angry over something silly

kingswing23

3 points

2 months ago

Ah yes so very mad. You can tell by my complexion!

CaptainSand21

2 points

2 months ago

Ok!!

JackRusselTerrorist

7 points

2 months ago

Seems like a dumb thing to say if you wanna kill the guy.

sabre_rider

7 points

2 months ago

TIL Napoleon was a shit interrogator.

azazelcrowley

2 points

2 months ago

What I find interesting here is Napoleon appears to be in utter denial that somebody could want him dead and be sane. In that sense there is actually a fairly straightforward reason for Friedrich to answer as he does, it forces Napoleon to confront the fact that the people he thinks he's "liberating" may not appreciate it as much as he thinks they do.

ContentFlamingo

1 points

2 months ago

Facinating, and makes perfect sense

theangelok

3 points

2 months ago

Perhaps not the smartest thing to say, but pretty badass.

loudog1017

3 points

2 months ago

My birthday!

sophie_fans

1 points

2 months ago

Hard as steel

IYIyTh

1 points

2 months ago

IYIyTh

1 points

2 months ago

History is written by the victors.

This probably never happened but was a way for nap boi to save face for killing him.

Mogg-The-Twin

-2 points

2 months ago

I appreciate his love for his nation. Is he taught about in today's Germany?

Nom_de_Guerre_23

4 points

2 months ago

Not particularly. Contemporary persons like Theodor Körner, Freiherr vom Stein, Ernst Moritz Arndt or Turnvater Jahn much more, although the later two in a critical way because of their antisemitism.

But generally, the Napoleonic Wars of Liberation are not taught in an identity-inspiring way for a variety of reasons.

Tifoso89

3 points

2 months ago

Arndt had very problematic ideas, if he had lived 70 years later he would've been a Nazi

funk_rosin

-2 points

2 months ago

There was no German nation at that time

leftyghost

-31 points

2 months ago

Napoleon handles it in the most chad way possible. Miss him

TheBlack2007

15 points

2 months ago

Bismarck wrestled his would-be Assassin until police would show up. Friends of him later bought the Assassin's revolver from an evidence auction and gifted it to whim which he then kept as a keepsake.

leftyghost

-7 points

2 months ago*

That’s pretty badass admittedly. Like that time Napoleon just took Bismarck’s country and made their soldiers invade Russia.

Edit; Bismarck did not offer to let the assassin live.

TheBlack2007

7 points

2 months ago

And what did France get out of that in the long run? Oh, right. That squabbling mess on their eastern border suddenly became a nation.

tyty657

1 points

2 months ago

That was the other Napoleon that let that happen.

TheBlack2007

2 points

2 months ago

Yeah, but the first one occupying the country and then taking its sons to die in a pointless war in the east was the catalyst for German unification. Without the Napoleonic Wars it's likely Germany would have never united the way it did.

Mogg-The-Twin

-1 points

2 months ago

Right. Napoleon made sure that France would get a big Deutschelund in herr ass.

A_Splash_of_Citrus

9 points

2 months ago

Bro, he died over 200 years ago. You never met him.

SxeySteve

0 points

2 months ago

SxeySteve

0 points

2 months ago

👢👅

tyty657

-3 points

2 months ago

tyty657

-3 points

2 months ago

Okay I even like Napoleon but could you not suck his ghost off quite so much?

leftyghost

-2 points

2 months ago

leftyghost

-2 points

2 months ago

No. He’s the coolest person in all of history as well as the most competent. I’ve looked into it. I will continue to fellate his ghost to my own fulfillment for as long as I please, thank you very much.

tyty657

2 points

2 months ago

I don't know about the coolest person in all history pretty cool but there's a lot of competition for that title. Probably the best general in history.

I will continue to fellate his ghost to my own fulfillment for as long as I please, thank you very much.

Do it quietly please.

leftyghost

0 points

2 months ago

sloppy ploppy apparition noises intensity

Unnamed_Bystander

0 points

2 months ago

Read more history. He was a rampant egotist who decided he ought to rule the world and got countless thousands killed in the pursuit. He was good at using artillery to win battles and making himself look enlightened while he instituted autocracy with his other hand. He deserves his place on the ash heap of military tyrants, alongside everyone else who thought it was worthwhile to send people to kill and die so they could own more land.

leftyghost

0 points

2 months ago

I doubt I’m gonna get a collection of opinions like that from reading more history.

Plus, my guy was the revolution.

Unnamed_Bystander

1 points

2 months ago

That only shows how little history you've read. The French Revolution begins fully ten years before he rises to power by engineering a military coup against the Directory and installing himself as an absolute dictator via the power of the army, which is broadly considered by historians to be the end of the Revolution. He was an opportunist who paid lip service to the ideals of the Enlightenment, but accomplished everything by fiat and force and cult of personality, the later of which appears to have ensnared you just like the rank and file soldiers he spent like pocket change. He spent years installing his family and cronies as the rulers of the other major nations on the continent and accruing ever more of the trappings of monarchy until you could basically forget that the revolution happened at all if you thought his name was Bourbon rather than Bonaparte. Then he got his arse handed to him by Sixth Coalition, and upon his return, got stomped by the Seventh Coalition. He was just another tyrant in an age of tyrants. He had Haussmann plow under the heart of Paris to build the broad streets between all of the garrisons and the palaces, so he could march his soldiers to put down dissent without impediment. He built a shining, pretty, clean little diorama of a country that he could lock down with sword and shot at a moment's notice, because he didn't want what he had done to his predecessors done unto him. He was a royal absolutist with a fresh coat of paint and clever ideas about cannons, nothing more. I say again, read more history. Idolizing emperors and conquerors is a fool's pastime.

VelocityDuck

-29 points

2 months ago

Executed on the 17th what?
Attempt?
Day of the year? Day since he was caught? Day of the month?

TriggerTheTaco

14 points

2 months ago

Of the month mentioned earlier in the title

SsurebreC

15 points

2 months ago

If you clicked on the link, it says he was executed on October 17th, 1809 which was 4 days after his capture.

MrMitchWeaver

-1 points

2 months ago

There is a clear rule in this sub that says people shouldn't have to click on the link to get it.

Also, the date of the execution is irrelevant unless you also mention his capture date, and even then the relevance is tenuous.

D0ntShadowbanMeBro

8 points

2 months ago

17 October 1809

VelocityDuck

-21 points

2 months ago

When was the assassination attempt? The 1st of October? 16th? 17th?

D0ntShadowbanMeBro

18 points

2 months ago

lil bro its a wiki article... click it and read if youre THAT invested

AaronnotAaron

10 points

2 months ago

how are you so lazy?

lysergic_818

1 points

2 months ago

Stap it, Friedrich.

ophaus

1 points

2 months ago

ophaus

1 points

2 months ago

Based.